Wednesday, February 3, 2010

About damn time

The Lancet retracts Andrew Wakefield’s article.
Ten of the original 12 authors of the study retracted their support for the study and its interpretation. In 2004 the Lancet published a retraction. However, it was only a partial retraction, and the study remained as part of the published literature.

10 out of 12 authors wasn't enough to fully retract it?

1 comment:

  1. I know! I saw this, too. 'Bout damn time is right! Of course, everybody's just going to say it's the Science Nazis suppressing damning information, but those people can suck it.