Ten of the original 12 authors of the study retracted their support for the study and its interpretation. In 2004 the Lancet published a retraction. However, it was only a partial retraction, and the study remained as part of the published literature.
10 out of 12 authors wasn't enough to fully retract it?
I know! I saw this, too. 'Bout damn time is right! Of course, everybody's just going to say it's the Science Nazis suppressing damning information, but those people can suck it.
ReplyDelete